Monthly ReportOct 1–31, 2025
Sepsis, October 2025 edition
We read 105 papers and selected 5.
Summary
October 2025 sepsis research increasingly emphasized precision management supported by bedside physiology, immune endotyping, and rapid molecular diagnostics. The strongest clinical signal came from the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 randomized trial, in which capillary-refill-time-guided resuscitation improved a hierarchical patient-centered outcome, primarily by reducing organ-support duration. Complementary evidence supported selected adjunctive hemodynamic strategies, including ultrashort-acting beta-blockers, while a validated four-gene panel highlighted the risk of non-stratified immunotherapy. Mechanistic studies continued to identify actionable immunometabolic and innate-immune targets, but most require prospective human validation before clinical adoption.
Selected Articles
1. Cloxacillin versus cefazolin for meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (CloCeBa): a prospective, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised clinical trial.
In this multicenter non-inferiority randomized trial, cefazolin was non-inferior to cloxacillin for 90-day outcomes in eligible MSSA bacteremia. Cefazolin was associated with substantially fewer serious adverse events and markedly less acute kidney injury, supporting its use as a safer parenteral option in many non-device and non-CNS infections.
Impact: It is a directly practice-relevant randomized antibiotic comparison showing equivalent efficacy with substantially improved renal safety.
Clinical Implications: Cefazolin can be considered a first-line parenteral option for eligible MSSA bloodstream infections, particularly when renal safety is important. Device-associated, central nervous system, and other excluded infection categories require separate treatment considerations.
Key Findings
- The 90-day composite outcome was 75% with cefazolin versus 74% with cloxacillin, meeting non-inferiority.
- Serious adverse events occurred in 15% versus 27%, respectively.
- Acute kidney injury occurred in 1% with cefazolin versus 12% with cloxacillin.
2. Personalized Hemodynamic Resuscitation Targeting Capillary Refill Time in Early Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
This multinational randomized clinical trial enrolled 1,467 patients across 86 centers in 19 countries and compared capillary-refill-time-targeted personalized hemodynamic resuscitation with usual care during early septic shock. The CRT strategy significantly improved a hierarchical 28-day composite outcome, with the benefit driven mainly by shorter duration of vital organ support rather than a clear mortality reduction.
Impact: It provides high-level, pragmatic evidence that a bedside perfusion measure can guide early resuscitation and improve a patient-centered outcome in septic shock.
Clinical Implications: Structured CRT-guided protocols may be incorporated into early septic shock care to reduce exposure to vasopressors and organ support. The absence of a definitive mortality benefit means implementation should include protocol training, appropriate patient selection, and continued outcome monitoring.
Key Findings
- The CRT-guided strategy produced a win ratio of 1.16 for the hierarchical 28-day composite outcome.
- The benefit was driven mainly by shorter duration of vital organ support.
- The study included 1,467 analyzed patients from 86 centers in 19 countries.
3. Effect of ultrashort-acting β-blocker on the mortality of patients with sepsis or septic shock: A systematic review and trial sequential meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
A systematic review and trial sequential meta-analysis of 27 randomized trials involving 2,253 patients found that ultrashort-acting beta-blockers were associated with lower 28-day mortality. The signal was strongest in patients with septic tachycardia or septic cardiomyopathy and in studies using esmolol, although standardized indications and safety protocols remain necessary.
Impact: It aggregates randomized evidence suggesting that carefully selected septic patients may benefit from controlling excessive adrenergic cardiac stress with short-acting beta-blockade.
Clinical Implications: Ultrashort-acting beta-blockers may be considered in persistent septic tachycardia or selected septic cardiomyopathy under continuous hemodynamic monitoring. The findings should not be generalized to all septic patients, and pragmatic mortality-focused trials are still desirable.
Key Findings
- Across 27 randomized trials and 2,253 patients, the pooled 28-day mortality relative risk was 0.66.
- Benefits were concentrated in septic tachycardia, septic cardiomyopathy, and esmolol-treated subgroups.
- Trial sequential analysis supported the robustness of the mortality signal.
4. A non-canonical immunometabolic function of BRD3 during sepsis.
This mechanistic study identified a BRD3-TRIM21-CREBBP-CREB1 axis that increases ACOD1 transcription in monocytes and macrophages and amplifies IL-1β/NLRP3-mediated inflammation. Myeloid-specific Brd3 deletion protected mice across four infection models, positioning BRD3 as a promising but still preclinical immunometabolic target.
Impact: It defines a previously unrecognized chromatin-immune-metabolic pathway with reproducible in vivo protection across multiple infection models.
Clinical Implications: BRD3 inhibition or modulation of the downstream pathway could become a host-directed strategy to limit maladaptive inflammation. Translation will require selective pharmacologic inhibitors, biomarker development, infection-specific safety assessment, and human validation.
Key Findings
- BRD3 cooperated with TRIM21, CREBBP, and CREB1 to drive ACOD1 transcription.
- Myeloid-specific Brd3 deletion reduced IL-1β/NLRP3-associated inflammation.
- BRD3 deficiency improved outcomes across four murine infection models.
5. Development of a gene panel for immune status assessment in sepsis.
This study developed and externally validated a four-gene blood panel consisting of TBX21, GNLY, PRF1, and IL2RB for immune-status assessment in sepsis. The panel achieved AUROCs of 0.891–0.909, and analysis of a randomized cohort suggested that an identified endotype could experience markedly higher mortality with hydrocortisone or thymosin treatment.
Impact: It offers a relatively compact, externally validated biomarker approach for identifying immune states that may modify the safety of immunomodulatory treatment.
Clinical Implications: The panel could support enrichment of biomarker-stratified trials and help avoid indiscriminate immunotherapy in potentially vulnerable endotypes. The treatment-interaction findings are hypothesis-generating and require prospective confirmation before routine clinical use.
Key Findings
- The four-gene panel achieved AUROCs of 0.891–0.909 for immune-status discrimination.
- The panel separated clinically meaningful immune endotypes in sepsis.
- Hydrocortisone or thymosin was associated with higher 90-day mortality in one identified endotype.